BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2000 THE EFFECTS OF PREDATOR LEARNING, FORGETTING, AND RECOGNITION ERRORS ON THE EVOLUTION OF WARNING COLORATION
Maria R. Servedio
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the specifics of predator avoidance learning, information loss, and recognition errors may heavily influence the evolution of aposematism. I establish a mathematical model of the change in frequency over time of bright individuals of a distasteful prey species. Warning color spreads through green beard selection as reformulated by Guilford (1990); bright colored forms gain an advantage due to their phenotypic resemblance to other bright forms, which have been sampled by the predator. I use a general classical conditioning model to examine gradual predator learning and forgetting, and then consider the extreme of one-trial learning and no forgetting over time that may occur with very toxic prey. The advantage of conspicuous coloration under these latter conditions depends upon its role in lowering a constant probability of the prey being misidentified and thus mistakenly attacked by a predator, a rarely emphasized factor in the evolution of warning coloration. This constant probability of mistaken attacks can also be interpreted as a constant probability that forgetting has occurred (forgetting does not increase with time) or a periodic decision by the predator to resample avoided prey. I show that when predators learn and forget gradually, as under the general classical conditioning model, it is very difficult for aposematic coloration to become established unless bright individuals cross an often high threshold frequency through chance factors. In contrast, the conditions expected with highly toxic prey promote the evolution of warning coloration more easily, by means from the fixation of very bright mutations to the fixation of successive mutations each of which causes a small increase in a prey's conspicuousness. The results therefore predict that aposematic coloration may have evolved in a different manner in different predator and prey systems. They also suggest that it may be extremely difficult for warning coloration to evolve in more mildly toxic or distasteful prey outside of a mimicry system.

Corresponding Editor: C. Boggs

Maria R. Servedio "THE EFFECTS OF PREDATOR LEARNING, FORGETTING, AND RECOGNITION ERRORS ON THE EVOLUTION OF WARNING COLORATION," Evolution 54(3), 751-763, (1 June 2000). https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0751:TEOPLF]2.3.CO;2
Received: 23 June 1999; Accepted: 1 December 1999; Published: 1 June 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
13 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
aposematism
evolution
forgetting
learning
model
taste aversion
warning color
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top